'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Saturday, December 12, 2009

on certainty 191


191. Well if everything speaks for an hypothesis and nothing against it – is it then certainly true? One may designate it as such. – But does it certainly agree with reality, with the facts? – With this question you are already going round in a circle.



if everything speaks for it and nothing against it –

it’s not an hypothesis –

it’s a prejudice

and this it seems is what certainty comes down to for Wittgenstein –

prejudice

can an hypothesis certainly agree with reality – with the facts?

reality – is what?

a response to the unknown –

a proposal or set of proposals

the facts – are what?

proposals

so does one set of proposals agree with another?

that’s the basic question

and any answer here –

will be open to question –

open to doubt –

uncertain


© greg t. charlton. 2010.