'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Monday, August 03, 2009

on certainty 92


92. However, we can ask: May someone have telling grounds for believing that the earth has only existed for a short time, say since his own birth? – Suppose we had always been told that, - would we have any good reason to doubt it? Men have believed that they could make rain; why should not a King be brought up to believe that the world began with him? And if Moore and this King were to meet and discuss, could Moore really prove his belief to be the right one? I do not say Moore could not convert the King to his view, but it would be a conversion of a special kind; the King would be brought to look at the world in a different way.

Remember that one is sometimes convinced of the correctness of a view by its simplicity or symmetry, i.e. these are what induce one to go over to this point of view. One can then say something like: “That’s how it must be.”



yes –

the point here –

is just that the issue is persuasion

that what we are dealing with –

in terms of what people believe –

is not logic – but rhetoric

and the reason is 

reality – independent of our imaginings –

is unknown –

therefore –

any account we make of reality –

is uncertain

another way of putting it –

is just to say –

in response to our proposals –

the unknown –

is silent


© greg t.charlton. 2009.