'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Sunday, May 31, 2009

on certainty 12


12. – For “I know” seems to describe a state of affairs which guarantees what is known, guarantees it as a fact. One always forgets the expression “I thought I knew”.



there are no guarantees –

and any ‘fact’ – is open to question –

open to doubt

if ‘I know’ is used to guarantee – what is ‘known’ – as a fact –

then in a logical sense –

‘I know’ is misused –

for ‘I know ‘ – so used is false and misleading

still the fact remains ‘I know’ is used in such a manner-

and what this shows is that the real function of ‘I know’ –

is rhetorical –

that is to say –

the point of it is persuasion –

a persuasion based on –

deception

‘I thought I knew’ –

is the realization that –

that if to know – is to be certain –

then –

‘I don’t know’


© greg t. charlton. 2009.