'For the person or persons that hold dominion, can no more combine with the keeping up of majesty the running with harlots drunk or naked about the streets, or the performances of a stage player, or the open violation or contempt of laws passed by themselves than they can combine existence with non-existence'.

- Benedict de Spinoza. Political Treatise. 1677.




Wednesday, May 06, 2015

Appendix 8: the concept "about". The problem of the "heap".


‘ “He came fro about there –.”
“About there is the brightest point of the horizon”.
“Make the plank about 2 m long”.’

‘about’ – is logically correct – and logically honest

any so called ‘precise’ measurement is a piece of rhetoric

point being any proposal of measurement – logically speaking is open to question – open to doubt – is uncertain

any ‘precise’ measurement can always be questioned

to pretend a propositional certainty is to avoid or deny the logical reality

we do just this – in any number of contexts – in order to proceed – to get on with it –

and it really is just a pretence – and an unnecessary one too –

for we can – in practise – quite easily accept the reality – the propositional reality – of uncertainty – and proceed – recognising that i.e. any proposed measurement – is open to question – open to doubt – is uncertain

and I would suggest that in fact we do this all the time

the quest for precision is best understood as an heuristic endeavour –

the goal of which is functionality

‘The indeterminacy of the word “heap”.’ –

the word ‘heap’ is a logical exemplar –

it embodies uncertainty –

any proposal – any word – is open to question – open to doubt – is uncertain

‘heap’ defeats any attempt to cover the this logical reality –

it defeats any attempt at determination

it is – logically speaking – straight up –

unpretentious



© greg t. charlton. 2015.