Thursday, January 29, 2015

Philosophical Grammar 142


142. Are we willing to call a series of independent signals “a language”?

Imagine a diary kept with signals. Are explanations given so that the signals are connected to another language?

A language consisting of commands. We wouldn’t say that a series of such signals alone would enable me to derive a picture of the movement of a man obeying them unless in addition to the signal there is something that might be called a general rule for translating into drawing.

The grammar explains the meaning of the signs and thus makes the language pictorial.



language interprets the world – or features of it

‘language’ – is a propositional complex

‘Are we willing to call a series of independent signals “a language”?’

independent signals – could well be regarded as a propositional complex –

that is to say – independent signals – could be proposed as a way of interpreting the world or features of it

‘Imagine a diary kept with signals. Are explanations given so that the signals are connected to another language?’

any sign or signal – if it is to be meaningful – will be interpreted – propositionally –

that is in terms of other propositions

we are not talking of different languages here – rather propositions – propositional complexes –

if you want to call propositional complexes – different languages – OK – it’s neither here nor there

the key thing is that any proposal – any proposition – any propositional complex – is open to question – open to doubt

any proposal – is uncertain

‘A language consisting of commands. We wouldn’t say that a series of such signals alone would enable me to derive a picture of the movement of a man obeying them unless in addition to the signal there is something that might be called a general rule for translating into drawing’?

a general rule for translating into drawing?

a proposal

‘The grammar explains the meaning of the signs and thus makes the language pictorial’?

grammar – a theory of the mechanics of language – a theory of how the signs work –

presumes meaning

does it explain meaning?

it might be said to put the bones to meaning – and show how the skeleton is constructed – even how it moves

pictorial?

are not all signs pictorial?



© greg t. charlton. 2015.