Tuesday, September 07, 2010

on certainty 648


648. I may convince someone else that I ‘can’t be making a mistake’.

I say to someone “So-and-so was with me this morning and told me such-and-such”. If this is astonishing he may ask me: “You can’t be mistaken about it?” That may mean: “Did that really happen this morning?” or, on the other hand: “Are you sure you understood him properly?” It’s easy to see what details I should add to show that I was not wrong about the time, and similarly to show that I hadn’t misunderstood the story. But all that cannot show that I haven’t dreamed the whole thing, or imagined it to myself in a dreamy way. Nor can it show that I haven’t perhaps made some slip of the tongue throughout. (That sort of thing does happen.)



perhaps you can convince others of your statements –

but can you ever really know that?

and can you be sure – if you have convinced them –

just what it is you have convinced them of?

convincing is a matter of persuasion – of rhetoric –

I think better to forget about it altogether –

say what you have to say – and leave it at that –

there will always be doubt –

even with the so called ‘slip of the tongue’ –

doubt is a sign of philosophic health –

your proposition has a 50/50 chance –

run with it


© greg t. charlton. 2010.